$BONER

Airdrop meta is heating up. Saturation is coming. The strong survive.

$UNC is the hot topic, and because it was first, there is room for people to believe in it.

Airdrop meta is intensifying and could soon become saturated, just like every meta we have seen before. The first signs will be people fully stacking their 30%+ clips, or airdrop recipients simply losing faith and selling their airdrop. We already saw a few examples of this today.

What are the ingredients to a successful coin?

  • A narrative that is not tied to one person
  • Not dependent on catalysts like “maybe Elon tweets”
  • A relatable meme
  • Strong holders

The more airdrops there are, the less people believe in their long-term potential. This has happened cyclically every time there has been an airdrop meta, regardless of scale. Examples include HL, Aster, Lit, and the diminishing returns that followed each new airdrop.

Right now, most airdrop coins being launched on-chain are relatively similar:

  • “Airdropping to top FOMO wallets”
  • “Airdropping to top $UNC holders”
  • And so on

If you keep airdropping to the same group of people over and over, they will probably feel more inclined to sell each new airdrop faster than the last one. After all, there is only so much liquidity to go around, and you cannot sustainably keep all of these “airdrop” coins at high valuations.

At the same time, you do want to airdrop to many of the same people, because they are some of the loudest players in the space. If they have a reason to hold, they will bagwork with more reach than you could achieve organically.

So how do you peak their curiosity after they have already been airdropped a handful of tokens?

You raise the floor, make the coin stronger, and keep strengthening it even while airdrop recipients dump their allocation.

If I buy 50% and airdrop all of it, and liquidity conditions are the same as any other pump token, whether it is me clipping the 50% or 50 people clipping 1%, the price gets equally demolished.

So here is the proposal:

  1. I am buying 75% at deployment, to be used as follows:
    • 60% will be locked forever
    • 14.5% will be distributed as 0.25% airdrops to 58 recipients (FOMO wallets, $UNC holders, long-time trenchers, and community contributors)
    • 0.5% will be kept by me as my personal stake
    This means each airdrop represents 0.625% of circulating supply, while my holdings represent 1.25% of circulating supply.
  2. Fee structure:
    • 96% goes to buybacks and LP adds (half will be bought back, and the other half of the SOL rewards will be paired and added to the liquidity pool)
    • 4% goes to the project’s operational costs, if any. If there are none, the community can later decide what to do with the accrued 4%.
  3. Fees earned from the liquidity pool created in step 2 will be used for further buybacks and burns.

So the floor begins with 75% bought. Liquidity only becomes more robust, even if airdrop recipients decide to clip their allocation. The more robust it gets from their volume, the more tokens get bought and burned, contributing to an eventual supply squeeze.

$BONER — you’re gonna wish you had one.
With great liquidity comes hardened floors.